SQL Server Forums
Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | Forum FAQ
 
Register Now and get your question answered!
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 SQL Server 2008 Forums
 SQL Server Administration (2008)
 SQL 2008 SAN configurations
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

scabral7
Yak Posting Veteran

53 Posts

Posted - 05/07/2012 :  11:15:13  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Hi,

We have been given a new 64 bit SQL data warehouse server with 2008 enterprise installed. Here are the specs given to us by the server admin group:

***
Server Storage provisioning - two RAID-10 arrays have been configured with standby hot spares. Each array is one independent volume as follows
D: 2.72TB
E: 2.72TB

The OS Volume (C:) runs a RAID-1 Mirror - total space of 465GB – with 428GB currently free
***

We have to migrate about 15 user databases from our current data warehouse to the new server and I'm trying to figure out the best way to configure the data and log files. I was thinking of separating out the data files to D: and log files to E:, but not sure if having just the log files on E: is overkill.

I was also thinking of moving tempdb over to the D: and tempdb log over to E: to take advantage of the RAID 10, but not sure if it is a good idea to have tempdb on same drive as data files.

Any suggestions would be helpful.

Sachin.Nand
Flowing Fount of Yak Knowledge

2937 Posts

Posted - 05/07/2012 :  12:10:47  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Separating log files is definitely not an overkill.Make sure that you benchmark the disk for sequential I/O's.How many spindles do you have for the drive you want to put the log file on ?If you have multiple then that is surely an overkill as you will be wasting it on sequential I/O's.

Don't understand the idea of having RAID for tempdb.Rather Data files and sql binaries should be going for RAID 1+0.

After Monday and Tuesday even the calendar says W T F ....
Go to Top of Page

scabral7
Yak Posting Veteran

53 Posts

Posted - 05/07/2012 :  12:38:19  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
volume D: and E: each have 6 separate spindles.

So should i just keep tempdb on C: drive, which is where it is now with other system dbs?
Go to Top of Page

Sachin.Nand
Flowing Fount of Yak Knowledge

2937 Posts

Posted - 05/07/2012 :  13:25:20  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
No do not treat tempdb as a system database.treat it as another user database.Have it on a faster separate disk.I would suggest go for RAID 0 for tempdb as it will benefit from striping and of course multiple file groups to prevent allocation contentions for tempdb.

Between any idea of how many physical disks there are ?

After Monday and Tuesday even the calendar says W T F ....
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
SQL Server Forums © 2000-2009 SQLTeam Publishing, LLC Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.08 seconds. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000