Please start any new threads on our new site at We've got lots of great SQL Server experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.

Our new SQL Server Forums are live! Come on over! We've restricted the ability to create new threads on these forums.

SQL Server Forums
Profile | Active Topics | Members | Search | Forum FAQ
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 SQL Server 2008 Forums
 SQL Server Administration (2008)
 Indexes and File Group
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Starting Member

17 Posts

Posted - 08/20/2013 :  21:43:31  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I know that its better to have all primary, clustered, non-clustered indexes in a different filegroup than data, but what I want to know is:
1. Should that be on a separate drive altogether for getting good performance?
2. If the Data and index is on the same drive, is that okay and/or what are the recommendations if I cant put indexes on a different drive.

Bustaz Kool
Flowing Fount of Yak Knowledge

1834 Posts

Posted - 08/22/2013 :  11:15:15  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Some feedback:
1) The Clustered index is where the data is; a Non-clustered index can put on a separate filegroup
2) The performance boost would come from having the data and indexes on separate physical drive; you would need them to be in separate filegroups in order to get them on separate drives.
3) How big is your data? There might not be a big boost if your data is small.
4) If you can't put them on separate drives now, you might still put them in separate filegroups so that you could easily move them at a later time. I don't see a drawback from having them separated.

The cure for anything is salt water -- sweat, tears, or the sea. -Isak Dinesen
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
SQL Server Forums © 2000-2009 SQLTeam Publishing, LLC Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.02 seconds. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000