Please start any new threads on our new site at We've got lots of great SQL Server experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.

Our new SQL Server Forums are live! Come on over! We've restricted the ability to create new threads on these forums.

SQL Server Forums
Profile | Active Topics | Members | Search | Forum FAQ
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 SQL Server 2008 Forums
 Transact-SQL (2008)
 Interesting Sql protocol issue around SP results
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Starting Member

45 Posts

Posted - 10/08/2012 :  10:42:38  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I have a requirement to return a batch of records and then mark the batch complete. I was thinking to acheive this with a select and the update. Something like:

UPDATE dbo.Table
SET Retrieved = 'Y'
OUTPUT inserted.x, inserted.y, inserted.z;
The question I have, is what happens if the procedure executes, returns the select but the connection breaks before the batch is re received Does the batch still get updated?

Otherwise can anyone think of a better way to acheive this with stored procs?

The Chadinator

1974 Posts

Posted - 10/08/2012 :  15:50:27  Show Profile  Visit chadmat's Homepage  Reply with Quote
You should just do an SP, return the records, then update. If it is all within a transaction it is all or nothing, everything commits, or everything rolls back.

Go to Top of Page

Very Important crosS Applying yaK Herder

52326 Posts

Posted - 10/08/2012 :  19:58:44  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
i think you should be doing select followed by an update of retrieved field as 'Y' both wrapped within a transaction

SQL Server MVP

Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
SQL Server Forums © 2000-2009 SQLTeam Publishing, LLC Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.02 seconds. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000