﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>SQLTeam.com Feed</title><link>http://www.sqlteam.com/sitefeed.aspx</link><description>SQL Server related articles and news from SQLTeam.com</description><copyright>(c) 2007, ClearData Consulting, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Alerts for when Login Failures Strike</title><description>&lt;p&gt;When repeated SQL Server login failures occur, a DBA should investigate. It could just be someone repeatedly typing in the wrong password. Worst case is a virus attack flooding your network with connection requests. Receiving an e-mail while login failures are occurring allows DBAs to investigate and fix the issue as soon as possible. So how is DBA notified of login failures without flooding their inbox?&lt;/p&gt;
</description><link>http://www.sqlteam.com/article/alerts-for-when-logins-failures-strike</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><comments>http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=106703</comments><guid>http://www.sqlteam.com/article/alerts-for-when-logins-failures-strike</guid></item><item><title>PASS Summit 2008 Speaker List</title><description>PASS released the list of &lt;a href="http://summit2008.sqlpass.org/spotlight-sessions.html"&gt;Spotlight Speakers and their session titles and abstracts&lt;/a&gt;.  They also released a partial list of the &lt;a href="http://summit2008.sqlpass.org/program-sessions.html"&gt;regular session speakers with their titles and abstracts&lt;/a&gt;.  This is the first 50 sessions of the 130+ total sessions.  As more speakers confirm their participation they'll update the speaker list.  Don't forget that the price increases by $200 after June 30th, 2008.</description><link>http://www.sqlteam.com/article/pass-summit-2008-speaker-list</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><comments>http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=105554</comments><guid>http://www.sqlteam.com/article/pass-summit-2008-speaker-list</guid></item><item><title>Implementing Table Interfaces</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Last time, we discussed &lt;a href="http://www.sqlteam.com/article/implementing-table-inheritance-in-sql-server"&gt;Table inheritance&lt;/a&gt;, which allowed us to easily reduce redundancies in our table design by creating "base" or "super" tables that contain columns and relations that "sub-tables" automatically inherit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That generally works well, but what if you just want to have several entities share a relation, but no common attributes? That is, the entities are not really the same type, and a base class wouldn't make a lot of sense. For example, suppose you are modeling Employees and Offices, and both entities can have multiple phone numbers that you'd like to store. Is there a simple way to create a data model for that without the need for redundant tables and code?&lt;/p&gt;
</description><link>http://www.sqlteam.com/article/implementing-table-interfaces</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><comments>http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=103145</comments><guid>http://www.sqlteam.com/article/implementing-table-interfaces</guid></item><item><title>Using xp_ReadErrorLog in SQL Server 2005</title><description>&lt;p&gt;I would like to share some interesting parameters I found for the undocumented extended stored procedure xp_ReadErrorLog. In doing some testing with this extended stored procedure I found four very interesting parameters.  Adding to some of the articles already on the web that discuss undocumented stored procedures, in this article I will explain my testing, use and some examples of the procedure.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://www.sqlteam.com/article/using-xp_readerrorlog-in-sql-server-2005</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><comments>http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=102641</comments><guid>http://www.sqlteam.com/article/using-xp_readerrorlog-in-sql-server-2005</guid></item><item><title>ApexSQL Giving Away 25 Copies of Enforce</title><description>&lt;p&gt;ApexSQL is launching a new product called Enforce.&amp;nbsp; As part of their launch they are giving away twenty-five copies to our members for participating in the forums.&amp;nbsp; Read on for the details and to find out if you've already won.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><link>http://www.sqlteam.com/article/apexsql-giving-away-25-copies-of-enforce</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><comments>http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=102367</comments><guid>http://www.sqlteam.com/article/apexsql-giving-away-25-copies-of-enforce</guid></item><item><title>Joining to the Next Sequential Row</title><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the more obscure requirements that a developer may find themselves facing is the need to compare a row with its immediate sibling. One such case is when a list of values needs to be processed to produce a moving average or to smooth a sequence of statistical numbers where their order is important.&amp;nbsp; For example, values lying along a time line. The solution is actually quite simple, but not immediately obvious.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><link>http://www.sqlteam.com/article/joining-to-the-next-sequential-row</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><comments>http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=100121</comments><guid>http://www.sqlteam.com/article/joining-to-the-next-sequential-row</guid></item><item><title>Using the TIME data type in SQL Server 2008</title><description>&lt;p&gt;SQL Server 2008 introduces a TIME data type which allows us to store the time without the date.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://www.sqlteam.com/article/using-the-time-data-type-in-sql-server-2008</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><comments>http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=98547</comments><guid>http://www.sqlteam.com/article/using-the-time-data-type-in-sql-server-2008</guid></item><item><title>Implementing Table Inheritance in SQL Server</title><description>&lt;p&gt;When designing a database, we sometimes come across situations where there are multiple types of entities that we are modeling, but we'd like them to all have certain attributes or relations in common.  Using "sub-type" tables is a simple way to implement table inheritance in SQL Server.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://www.sqlteam.com/article/implementing-table-inheritance-in-sql-server</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><comments>http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=97618</comments><guid>http://www.sqlteam.com/article/implementing-table-inheritance-in-sql-server</guid></item><item><title>Writing Outer Joins in T-SQL</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Occasionally someone will ask for my help with a query and say that both a right outer join and a left outer join was tried, and still the expected results were not achieved. That made me realize that some developers do not completely understand outer joins and that an article explaining how to use them might help.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://www.sqlteam.com/article/writing-outer-joins-in-t-sql</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><comments>http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=97137</comments><guid>http://www.sqlteam.com/article/writing-outer-joins-in-t-sql</guid></item><item><title>Integrating Profiler and PerfMon Log Files</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Troubleshooting SQL Server requires the use of both PerfMon (Performance/System Monitor) and SQL Trace files created by SQL Profiler or directly by SQL Server trace. Analysis of the gathered data is much easier if you can correlate your trace file with the PerfMon counters. In this article I'll show how to create a PerfMon counters log file and SQL Profiler Trace file, how to read them both and how to correlate the two files in SQL Profiler.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><link>http://www.sqlteam.com/article/integrating-profiler-and-perfmon-log-files</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><comments>http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=96810</comments><guid>http://www.sqlteam.com/article/integrating-profiler-and-perfmon-log-files</guid></item><item><title>Which is Faster: SAN or Directly-Attached Storage?</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Or should I place my database files on SAN or directly-attached storage? This is a frequently asked question. It comes up
repeatedly in public newsgroups, email discussion lists, and private meetings with customers who are concerned with database performance.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><link>http://www.sqlteam.com/article/which-is-faster-san-or-directly-attached-storage</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><comments>http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=95871</comments><guid>http://www.sqlteam.com/article/which-is-faster-san-or-directly-attached-storage</guid></item><item><title>Using Included Columns in SQL Server 2005</title><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the new features found in SQL Server 2005 is the ability to add additional columns, called Included Columns, to a non-clustered index. This article will explain the advantages of using included columns and what impact they will have on your database.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><link>http://www.sqlteam.com/article/included-columns-sql-server-2005</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><comments>http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=95468</comments><guid>http://www.sqlteam.com/article/included-columns-sql-server-2005</guid></item></channel></rss>