Please start any new threads on our new
site at https://forums.sqlteam.com. We've got lots of great SQL Server
experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.
| Author |
Topic |
|
AskSQLTeam
Ask SQLTeam Question
0 Posts |
 Posted - 2001-12-14 : 10:53:22
|
| marlon writes "im planning to implement a replication in my sql server 2000 and we're at the last part of our development phase and my problem is transactional replication add timestamp column and it will be a huge problem for our development team, can i still use transactional replication with immediate update without using timestamp im my columns? or use the timestamp columns but wont affect the system we develop, by the way im going to use replication for my standby server. ;) thank you very much.marlon" |
|
|
PiecesOfEight
Posting Yak Master
200 Posts |
Posted - 2001-12-14 : 11:20:03
|
| From BOL:Instead of using a timestamp column to track updates (as in SQL Server 7.0), a uniqueidentifier column, added automatically to any tables used in the publication, is used to track updates. The addition of this column requires INSERT statements to have column lists.Is it a problem having the uniqueidentifier column added? |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
replication article issues