Please start any new threads on our new 
    site at https://forums.sqlteam.com.  We've got lots of great SQL Server
    experts to answer whatever question you can come up with. 
    
        
            
                
                    
                        
                            
                                | Author | 
                                
                                 Topic  | 
                             
                            
                                    | 
                                         jholovacs 
                                        Posting Yak  Master 
                                         
                                        
                                        163 Posts  | 
                                        
                                        
                                            
                                            
                                             Posted - 2008-12-02 : 11:45:31
                                            
  | 
                                             
                                            
                                            | An associate of mine created a single report with 3 different email subscriptions:1 subscription emails the report at 7:35 on days 2-30 in April, June, September, and November.1 Subscription emails the report at 7:30 on days 2-31 in January, March, may, Jul, August,October, and December.1 Subscription emails the report at 7:25 on days 2-28 in February.Obviously, the intent of these subscriptions is to mail the report on every day EXCEPT the 1st of each month.Interestingly enough, today (being the second of December) two emails were sent, one from the 30-day subscription, and one from the 31-day subscription, which caused a certain level of consternation.  The schedules clearly list the mutually exclusive months they are to run, but it seems like the subscription scheduler completely ignored the month filter.I cannot imagine how this would be behavior by design, and I am at a loss as to why this is.  Is this a bug?  Can anyone recreate this?  I have looked online and found no mention of this sort of behavior.___________________________Geek At Large | 
                                             
                                         
                                     | 
                             
       
                            
                       
                          
                            
                                    | 
                                     jholovacs 
                                    Posting Yak  Master 
                                     
                                    
                                    163 Posts  | 
                                    
                                      
                                     | 
                                   
                            
                       
                          
                            
                                    | 
                                     spirit1 
                                    Cybernetic Yak Master 
                                     
                                    
                                    11752 Posts  | 
                                    
                                      
                                        
                                          
                                           
                                            Posted - 2008-12-02 : 14:40:56
                                          
  | 
                                         
                                        
                                          oh come on! if they fixed every bug, you'd be out of a job as everything would work with a press of a button.  ___________________________________________________________________________Causing trouble since 1980Blog: http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/mladenpSpeed up SSMS development: www.ssmstoolspack.com <- version 1.1 out!  | 
                                         
                                        
                                            | 
                                         
                                       
                                     | 
                                   
                            
                            
                                | 
                                    
                                      
                                     
                                    
                                 | 
                             
                         
                     | 
                 
             
         |   
     
     
            
              
	     |  
		
			
     
          
		 |