Please start any new threads on our new
site at https://forums.sqlteam.com. We've got lots of great SQL Server
experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.
Author |
Topic |
sqlserverdbam
Yak Posting Veteran
54 Posts |
Posted - 2009-03-10 : 15:35:49
|
Hi,I want to architect disk layout of sql server 2005.What is the best practice for MS SQLSERVER 2005 clustering disk layout?Please let know if have any document etc.thx |
|
heavymind
Posting Yak Master
115 Posts |
Posted - 2009-03-10 : 16:20:20
|
what do you mean "disk layout"? clustred groups? raid arrays for log/data/etc ?Thanks, VadymMCITP DBA 2005/2008Chief DBA at http://www.db-staff.com |
 |
|
sqlserverdbam
Yak Posting Veteran
54 Posts |
Posted - 2009-03-13 : 10:14:39
|
For cluster enviornment and non-cluster enviornment.likeraid arrays for log m: (Which RAID type)raid arrays for data n: (Which RAID type)raid arrays for temp o: (Which RAID type)MS SQL SERVER binary c: (which raid type)How many disk drives are suggested?Thanks |
 |
|
trbryant
Starting Member
1 Post |
Posted - 2009-03-19 : 15:03:19
|
This is a matter of preferrence and it seems as if everyone has their own "formula", however at this point we use:log = RAID 10data = RAID 5 tempdb = RAID 1I also prefer bigger servers (memory, cpu, cores) with bigger I/O capacity and connect different HBA's to the SAN for each group. I hope this works.quote: Originally posted by sqlserverdbam For cluster enviornment and non-cluster enviornment.likeraid arrays for log m: (Which RAID type)raid arrays for data n: (Which RAID type)raid arrays for temp o: (Which RAID type)MS SQL SERVER binary c: (which raid type)How many disk drives are suggested?Thanks
|
 |
|
|
|
|