Please start any new threads on our new
site at https://forums.sqlteam.com. We've got lots of great SQL Server
experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.
Author |
Topic |
nicklaz
Starting Member
3 Posts |
Posted - 2009-07-01 : 14:50:00
|
we are in the process of setting up a new environment for our ERP. it runs sql 2008 as the backend with a fat client that hits the sql server directly. we've had some performance problems with our current server that supports 30 users and this new server is supposed to scale to 300 users. our application vendor is not very knowledgeable when it comes to sql configuration and administration so we can't really rely on them to set things up. i have a good grasp of the processing power that we will need and i'm think we're spec'ing the correct type of storage. we're going to use direct attached SAS array but we're not sure of the number of disks yet. we're trying to run some benchmarks now to estimate what the io requirements will be with 300 users. we're a bit concerned about the transaction levels that we've been seeing since we started looking at the numbers. for 30 users, the average tx per second are between 20-80 but there are times that they will go all the way up to 500 tx per sec so this is a major concern as far selecting the optimal number of drives.my main concern though is how to set up the drives. most best practice articles i've read state that the drives should be configured in three raid10 sets. one for the db, one for the logs, and the last for the tempdb. is this what you guys would recommend? |
|
|
|
|