Please start any new threads on our new
site at https://forums.sqlteam.com. We've got lots of great SQL Server
experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.
Author |
Topic |
desmallbiz
Starting Member
2 Posts |
Posted - 2009-08-06 : 22:11:12
|
With the popularity of SQL Server Express on the rise, I am finding many sites unable to manage their transaction logs on their own.Is their a consensus opinion for using the Simple Recovery model at less sophisticated sites, some most likely running Express. thanks in advance |
|
jholovacs
Posting Yak Master
163 Posts |
Posted - 2009-08-07 : 10:32:34
|
Consensus? I don't think you'll find that with a general version-to-recovery model statement. The recovery model should reflect the business needs for recoverability and resource utilization; generally speaking however, if you are using SQL Express, your data is small enough and manageable enough that the Simple recovery mode would be adequate in most situations... if your data is business-critical to the point that it requires point-in-time recoverability, chances are that you have outgrown SQL Server Express edition already....but that's just my opinion. I expect others will disagree. SELECT TOP 1 w.[name]FROM dbo.women wINNER JOIN dbo.inlaws i ON i.inlaw_id = w.parent_idWHERE i.net_worth > 10000000 AND i.status IN ('dead', 'dying') AND w.husband_id IS NULLORDER BY w.hotness_factor DESC |
 |
|
desmallbiz
Starting Member
2 Posts |
Posted - 2009-08-07 : 15:41:42
|
Yes, lot's of room for subjectivity but without the tools to manage automated frequent transaction log backups one would think a simple recovery model would be most appropriate. Most firms using SQL Express don't have a DBA or for many an IT staff. I'm not sure how they can hope to manage a log file. |
 |
|
russell
Pyro-ma-ni-yak
5072 Posts |
Posted - 2009-08-07 : 16:47:04
|
This question must always be answered with the following question:"How much data/work are you willing to lose?" |
 |
|
|
|
|