Please start any new threads on our new site at https://forums.sqlteam.com. We've got lots of great SQL Server experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.

 All Forums
 SQL Server 2005 Forums
 Transact-SQL (2005)
 Either Or But Not Both

Author  Topic 

Iconic
Starting Member

1 Post

Posted - 2010-03-23 : 09:56:18
Sounds simple enough...
I have a table of media Stations (TV, Radio, etc) which contains a field called CALL_LETTER and one called BAND_TYPE (TV, Radio, etc).
I have ANOTHER table called Vendor, which has the name of who's paying the bill.
In some cases, the Vendor.VENDOR_NAME is the Station.CALL_LETTER and some other cases, the VENDOR_NAME is the CALL_LETTER and the BAND_TYPE.
I did my WHERE statement like this:
((v.VENDOR_NAME = s.CALL_LETTERS + '-' + s.BAND_CODE) OR (v.VENDOR_NAME = s.CALL_LETTERS))
That solved 90% of my problems. However, in some RARE cases, I have duplicates where the only difference is the VENDOR_NAME (one is with just CALL_LETTER and the other is CALL_LETTER + '-' + BAND_TYPE
So instead of getting x number of records, I'm getting x*2 number of records.

*OTHER FIELDS are identical for both records
-----------------------------------------------------------------
- CALL_LETTER - BAND_TYPE - VENDOR_NAME - OTHER FIELDS* -
-----------------------------------------------------------------
- WPIX - TV - WPIX-TV - -
- WPIX - TV - WPIX - -
- WATL - TV - WATL-TV - -
- WKBL - TV - WKBL - -
-----------------------------------------------------------------

How do I make it so that only ONE of the WPIX stations show but not both, while keeping the WATL and the WKBL as well??
Does that make sense?
Thanks

webfred
Master Smack Fu Yak Hacker

8781 Posts

Posted - 2010-03-23 : 10:19:10
Accept the "duplicates", have a look at them and then correct your data in the Vendor table.
That should be the best way.


No, you're never too old to Yak'n'Roll if you're too young to die.
Go to Top of Page

visakh16
Very Important crosS Applying yaK Herder

52326 Posts

Posted - 2010-03-23 : 10:21:21
[code]SELECT required columns....
FROM
(
SELECT yourcurrentcolumns...,ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY CALL_LETTER,BAND_TYPE ORDER BY LEN(VENDOR_NAME) DESC) AS Seq
FROM
....rest of query
)t
WHERE Seq=1
[/code]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SQL Server MVP
http://visakhm.blogspot.com/

Go to Top of Page

webfred
Master Smack Fu Yak Hacker

8781 Posts

Posted - 2010-03-23 : 10:29:49
Yes you can use Visakh's solution and go on with that messy data


No, you're never too old to Yak'n'Roll if you're too young to die.
Go to Top of Page

DBA in the making
Aged Yak Warrior

638 Posts

Posted - 2010-03-23 : 10:46:38
How many vendors are there for each station? If each station only has a single vendor, then there should be a Vendor column in the station table which is a foreign key, related to the primary key of the station table.

Using the vendor name to determine which station records are related to which vendor records is a bad idea. Using key columns makes much more sense.

There are 10 types of people in the world, those that understand binary, and those that don't.
Go to Top of Page
   

- Advertisement -