Please start any new threads on our new
site at https://forums.sqlteam.com. We've got lots of great SQL Server
experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.
| Author |
Topic |
|
dev45
Yak Posting Veteran
54 Posts |
Posted - 2004-10-01 : 02:25:34
|
| helloi have 1 table which have an image column Table1 (id1 int, imCol1 image)i want to update the contents of a record with the ones of another recordthis is what i do :EXEC sp_dboption 'dbName, 'select into/bulkcopy', 'true'DECLARE @ptrvalSource binary(16),@ptrvalTarget binary(16)SELECT @ptrvalSource = TEXTPTR(imCol1) FROM Table1Where id= 1SELECT @ptrvalTarget = TEXTPTR(imCol1) FROM Table1Where id = 2WRITETEXT Table1.imCol1 @ptrvalTarget @ptrvalSource if imCol1 = 0x31 where id= 1 , why after the update imCol1 = 0xF7FFDD3D000000002401000001000500 where id =2 ? shouldn't it be 0x31 as well ? |
|
|
jen
Master Smack Fu Yak Hacker
4110 Posts |
Posted - 2004-10-01 : 03:15:04
|
| wouldn't be better and easier to manage if you just save the path of the image instead of saving the image in your database?just a thought... |
 |
|
|
dev45
Yak Posting Veteran
54 Posts |
Posted - 2004-10-01 : 03:39:44
|
| it is an image datatype columnit stores entire word documents ...and it is the clients will not to keep the file on the disc (on a hard disk folder) but instead use the db.... |
 |
|
|
AndrewMurphy
Master Smack Fu Yak Hacker
2916 Posts |
Posted - 2004-10-01 : 05:06:21
|
| Because of the problems you are encoutering with this datatype (and this is only the beginning!!!)....this advice definitely applies....search here for more detailed arguements in favour of keeping images out of SQL....even if the client thinks it's a neat idea....not every invention/feature from M$ is worth the investment!!!!"wouldn't be better and easier to manage if you just save the path of the image instead of saving the image in your database?" |
 |
|
|
|
|
|