Please start any new threads on our new site at https://forums.sqlteam.com. We've got lots of great SQL Server experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.

 All Forums
 General SQL Server Forums
 New to SQL Server Programming
 is sql server able to handle complex data

Author  Topic 

khennessy86
Starting Member

5 Posts

Posted - 2006-02-16 : 07:28:36
hey
is sql server able to handle complex data compared to oracle ,mysql or access

Kristen
Test

22859 Posts

Posted - 2006-02-16 : 07:49:57
Hi khennessy86, Welcome to SQL Team!

I don't know if its just me being thick! but what do you mean by "complex data" ?

Kristen
Go to Top of Page

madhivanan
Premature Yak Congratulator

22864 Posts

Posted - 2006-02-16 : 07:54:02
Define the complex data

Madhivanan

Failing to plan is Planning to fail
Go to Top of Page

khennessy86
Starting Member

5 Posts

Posted - 2006-02-16 : 10:39:59
what i meant by complex data was video clips , music clips that sort of thing
Go to Top of Page

Kristen
Test

22859 Posts

Posted - 2006-02-16 : 12:02:49
Yes, SQL Server can handle that, but it is generally advised to store that sort of data in the file system and store the path + filename in the database.

See: http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=55210&SearchTerms=image

Kristen
Go to Top of Page

Michael Valentine Jones
Yak DBA Kernel (pronounced Colonel)

7020 Posts

Posted - 2006-02-16 : 14:59:01
quote:
Originally posted by khennessy86

what i meant by complex data was video clips , music clips that sort of thing



I believe Microsoft Sharepoint can store all those types of data, and Sharepoint stores all of it's data in a SQL Server database.



CODO ERGO SUM
Go to Top of Page

jhermiz

3564 Posts

Posted - 2006-02-16 : 15:48:57
quote:
Originally posted by Michael Valentine Jones

quote:
Originally posted by khennessy86

what i meant by complex data was video clips , music clips that sort of thing



I believe Microsoft Sharepoint can store all those types of data, and Sharepoint stores all of it's data in a SQL Server database.



CODO ERGO SUM



Sure does, the issue is finding that data is difficult. Table names are pretty cryptic or unusual. Fields have abnormal names like:
varchar1, varchar2, varchar3...etc :)



Keeping the web experience alive -- [url]http://www.web-impulse.com[/url]

RS Blog -- [url]http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/jhermiz[/url]
Go to Top of Page

tkizer
Almighty SQL Goddess

38200 Posts

Posted - 2006-02-16 : 15:52:59
I once had to support a database that had column names like Thing1, Thing2, ... It was a COTS package. I believe they did it so that their customers couldn't figure out their schema. It must have been hard to develop on it though.

Tara Kizer
aka tduggan
Go to Top of Page

Michael Valentine Jones
Yak DBA Kernel (pronounced Colonel)

7020 Posts

Posted - 2006-02-16 : 16:08:19
quote:
Originally posted by jhermiz
...Sure does, the issue is finding that data is difficult. Table names are pretty cryptic or unusual. Fields have abnormal names like:
varchar1, varchar2, varchar3...etc :)...


I agree. I was just making the point that it can be done.

If you are using Sharepoint, I don't think it's a good idea to try to hit the database directly to get data. If you can't get what you need through the Sharepoint interface, it isn't the tool you need. Even if you can figure out where data is, that doesn't mean that's where it will be after the next release.




CODO ERGO SUM
Go to Top of Page

druer
Constraint Violating Yak Guru

314 Posts

Posted - 2006-02-17 : 08:35:03
Trying to make the schema hard to figure out is the most bizarre notion invented by coders. If you spell it out for more customers they couldn't select their top 10 customers from the database. And if they want to get to the data, they will certainly find a way. Sounds like programmers at Microsoft and the developers of the application that Tara had to support both coded for and probably had great job security. It's not hard enough to maintain other peoples code as it is, why not add the challenge of select thing1, thing2, thing3, thing5 from bigthing inner join otherthing on bigthing.thing1 = otherthing.something where bigthing.thing122 = @thingvariable order by thing3, thing5. Wooo hoo. I got the list of things I needed. Probably the same coders behind teh eBay "IT" adds.
Go to Top of Page

Kristen
Test

22859 Posts

Posted - 2006-02-17 : 13:16:40
druer, you left out thing4

Kristen
Go to Top of Page
   

- Advertisement -